翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era
・ Development and Application Systems Conference
・ Development and Change
・ Development and discovery of SSRI drugs
・ Development and Education Programme for Daughters and Communities
・ Development and Educational Communication Unit
・ Development and Peace
・ Development and Peace (Canada)
・ Development and Peace (political party)
・ Development and preservation in Dublin
・ Development and Psychopathology
・ Development anthropology
・ Development approvals
・ Development Area Stadium
・ Development as Freedom
Development Assistance Accountability Act
・ Development Assistance Committee
・ Development Assistance Database
・ Development bank
・ Development Bank of Japan
・ Development Bank of Kenya
・ Development Bank of Namibia
・ Development Bank of Saxony
・ Development Bank of Southern Africa
・ Development Bank of the Philippines
・ Development Bureau
・ Development Business
・ Development case
・ Development chef
・ Development communication


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Development Assistance Accountability Act : ウィキペディア英語版
The Official Development Assistance Accountability Act, Bill C-293, is a piece of Canadian federal legislation that governs how development aid given to foreign countries is delivered and administered. The bill was introduced as a Private Member's Bill by Liberal MP John McKay which called for significant changes to the manner in which Canada’s official development assistance is delivered and administered. Often referred to as the ‘Better Aid Bill,’ its primary purpose is to mandate that the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) target Canada’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) to the specific goal of poverty reduction in developing nations. Prior to the passage of C-293, parliamentary committees and NGOs had called for a clearer mandate for ODA. Critics of Canada’s aid spending noted that assistance was often sent to countries that had recently experienced strong economic growth and prosperity or had dubious records regarding human rights. In an article from June 19, 2007, National Post columnist John Ivison reported that Canada had sent $7.7 million to the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland for job creation programs and reconciliation projects, despite the country’s healthy economy, lower taxation rate and higher per capita GDP.John Ivison. The National Post. Tuesday, June 19, 2007 In another example, Ivison noted that in 2004-2005 China received $57 million in ODA, amid concerns held by the international community about human rights abuses.The Bill established a set of principles that CIDA must take into account when judging how aid is to be spent. First, it requires that the perspectives and concerns of those who receive ODA be taken into account. This means that Canadian aid flows will have to respect the priorities of its beneficiaries - the people living in poverty. Secondly, it requires that ODA be promulgated in a manner consistent with Canadian values and foreign policy, sustainable development, and the promotion of democracy and human rights. The Bill also requires that Canadian foreign aid spending be more transparent and accountable to Parliament and must be reported in a timely manner. Due to the legislated focus on long-term poverty reduction, ODA cannot be redirected towards international military efforts or short-term disaster relief (areas of policy that the Canadian government must fund separately) and is subject to judicial review and oversight by the Minister. The Honourable Romeo Dallaire moved third reading of C-293 in the Senate. Senator Dallaire hailed the Bill saying: “My colleague in the other place, the Honourable John McKay, introduced Bill C-293 in the House of Commons in May 2006, almost two years ago. It has come a long way since then and has been put through many valuable and essential debates. I believe the debates initiated by Bill C-293 were so important that they will inform the nature of any future essential international development policy and legislation in this country. It is a first step.”http://sen.parl.gc.ca/SenWeb/speeches/details.asp?lang=en&sen=47&speechID=417On March 20, 2008 C-293 passed third reading in the House of Commons with unanimous support from all parties. It received Royal Assent on May 29, 2008, thus becoming law as the Development Assistance Accountability Act, (An Act respecting the provision of official development assistance abroad).Canada’s Official Development Assistance Accountability Act represents a trend among other nations that provide foreign aid toward legislated mandates for the provision of foreign aid. In 2002 the U.K. passed the International Development Act that entrenched poverty reduction as the preponderant focus of its foreign aid.http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/PRB-e/PRB0631-e.pdf Other countries with similar legislation include Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Luxembourg, Denmark and Belgium.C-293 has received praise from a diverse array of groups and organizations including Canada's Coalition to End Global Poverty,http://www.ccic.ca/e/004/news_2008-05-09_development_ngos_applaud_passing_of_foreign_aid_bill.shtml Make Poverty History,http://www.makepovertyhistory.ca/en/blog/view-house-commons-gallery-passage-better-aid-bill Engineers without Bordershttp://www.ewb.ca/en/enews/2008/06/5.html and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.http://www.evangelicalfellowship.ca/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=187==References==

The Official Development Assistance Accountability Act, Bill C-293, is a piece of Canadian federal legislation that governs how development aid given to foreign countries is delivered and administered. The bill was introduced as a Private Member's Bill by Liberal MP John McKay which called for significant changes to the manner in which Canada’s official development assistance is delivered and administered.
Often referred to as the ‘Better Aid Bill,’ its primary purpose is to mandate that the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) target Canada’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) to the specific goal of poverty reduction in developing nations.
Prior to the passage of C-293, parliamentary committees and NGOs had called for a clearer mandate for ODA. Critics of Canada’s aid spending noted that assistance was often sent to countries that had recently experienced strong economic growth and prosperity or had dubious records regarding human rights. In an article from June 19, 2007, National Post columnist John Ivison reported that Canada had sent $7.7 million to the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland for job creation programs and reconciliation projects, despite the country’s healthy economy, lower taxation rate and higher per capita GDP.〔John Ivison. The National Post. Tuesday, June 19, 2007〕 In another example, Ivison noted that in 2004-2005 China received $57 million in ODA, amid concerns held by the international community about human rights abuses.
The Bill established a set of principles that CIDA must take into account when judging how aid is to be spent. First, it requires that the perspectives and concerns of those who receive ODA be taken into account. This means that Canadian aid flows will have to respect the priorities of its beneficiaries - the people living in poverty. Secondly, it requires that ODA be promulgated in a manner consistent with Canadian values and foreign policy, sustainable development, and the promotion of democracy and human rights. The Bill also requires that Canadian foreign aid spending be more transparent and accountable to Parliament and must be reported in a timely manner.
Due to the legislated focus on long-term poverty reduction, ODA cannot be redirected towards international military efforts or short-term disaster relief (areas of policy that the Canadian government must fund separately) and is subject to judicial review and oversight by the Minister.
The Honourable Romeo Dallaire moved third reading of C-293 in the Senate. Senator Dallaire hailed the Bill saying: “My colleague in the other place, the Honourable John McKay, introduced Bill C-293 in the House of Commons in May 2006, almost two years ago. It has come a long way since then and has been put through many valuable and essential debates. I believe the debates initiated by Bill C-293 were so important that they will inform the nature of any future essential international development policy and legislation in this country. It is a first step.”〔http://sen.parl.gc.ca/SenWeb/speeches/details.asp?lang=en&sen=47&speechID=417〕
On March 20, 2008 C-293 passed third reading in the House of Commons with unanimous support from all parties. It received Royal Assent on May 29, 2008, thus becoming law as the Development Assistance Accountability Act, (An Act respecting the provision of official development assistance abroad).
Canada’s Official Development Assistance Accountability Act represents a trend among other nations that provide foreign aid toward legislated mandates for the provision of foreign aid. In 2002 the U.K. passed the International Development Act that entrenched poverty reduction as the preponderant focus of its foreign aid.〔http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/PRB-e/PRB0631-e.pdf〕 Other countries with similar legislation include Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Luxembourg, Denmark and Belgium.
C-293 has received praise from a diverse array of groups and organizations including Canada's Coalition to End Global Poverty,〔http://www.ccic.ca/e/004/news_2008-05-09_development_ngos_applaud_passing_of_foreign_aid_bill.shtml〕
Make Poverty History,〔http://www.makepovertyhistory.ca/en/blog/view-house-commons-gallery-passage-better-aid-bill〕 Engineers without Borders〔http://www.ewb.ca/en/enews/2008/06/5.html〕 and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.〔http://www.evangelicalfellowship.ca/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=187〕
==References==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「The Official Development Assistance Accountability Act, Bill C-293, is a piece of Canadian federal legislation that governs how development aid given to foreign countries is delivered and administered. The bill was introduced as a Private Member's Bill by Liberal MP John McKay which called for significant changes to the manner in which Canada’s official development assistance is delivered and administered. Often referred to as the ‘Better Aid Bill,’ its primary purpose is to mandate that the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) target Canada’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) to the specific goal of poverty reduction in developing nations. Prior to the passage of C-293, parliamentary committees and NGOs had called for a clearer mandate for ODA. Critics of Canada’s aid spending noted that assistance was often sent to countries that had recently experienced strong economic growth and prosperity or had dubious records regarding human rights. In an article from June 19, 2007, National Post columnist John Ivison reported that Canada had sent $7.7 million to the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland for job creation programs and reconciliation projects, despite the country’s healthy economy, lower taxation rate and higher per capita GDP.John Ivison. The National Post. Tuesday, June 19, 2007 In another example, Ivison noted that in 2004-2005 China received $57 million in ODA, amid concerns held by the international community about human rights abuses.The Bill established a set of principles that CIDA must take into account when judging how aid is to be spent. First, it requires that the perspectives and concerns of those who receive ODA be taken into account. This means that Canadian aid flows will have to respect the priorities of its beneficiaries - the people living in poverty. Secondly, it requires that ODA be promulgated in a manner consistent with Canadian values and foreign policy, sustainable development, and the promotion of democracy and human rights. The Bill also requires that Canadian foreign aid spending be more transparent and accountable to Parliament and must be reported in a timely manner. Due to the legislated focus on long-term poverty reduction, ODA cannot be redirected towards international military efforts or short-term disaster relief (areas of policy that the Canadian government must fund separately) and is subject to judicial review and oversight by the Minister. The Honourable Romeo Dallaire moved third reading of C-293 in the Senate. Senator Dallaire hailed the Bill saying: “My colleague in the other place, the Honourable John McKay, introduced Bill C-293 in the House of Commons in May 2006, almost two years ago. It has come a long way since then and has been put through many valuable and essential debates. I believe the debates initiated by Bill C-293 were so important that they will inform the nature of any future essential international development policy and legislation in this country. It is a first step.”http://sen.parl.gc.ca/SenWeb/speeches/details.asp?lang=en&sen=47&speechID=417On March 20, 2008 C-293 passed third reading in the House of Commons with unanimous support from all parties. It received Royal Assent on May 29, 2008, thus becoming law as the Development Assistance Accountability Act, (An Act respecting the provision of official development assistance abroad).Canada’s Official Development Assistance Accountability Act represents a trend among other nations that provide foreign aid toward legislated mandates for the provision of foreign aid. In 2002 the U.K. passed the International Development Act that entrenched poverty reduction as the preponderant focus of its foreign aid.http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/PRB-e/PRB0631-e.pdf Other countries with similar legislation include Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Luxembourg, Denmark and Belgium.C-293 has received praise from a diverse array of groups and organizations including Canada's Coalition to End Global Poverty,http://www.ccic.ca/e/004/news_2008-05-09_development_ngos_applaud_passing_of_foreign_aid_bill.shtml Make Poverty History,http://www.makepovertyhistory.ca/en/blog/view-house-commons-gallery-passage-better-aid-bill Engineers without Bordershttp://www.ewb.ca/en/enews/2008/06/5.html and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.http://www.evangelicalfellowship.ca/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=187==References==」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.